Skip to content

Thinking Beyond the Dissertation–by 肉圓邑(邑寶寶的鄉土名)

12/19/2005

在我忙期末報告正值昏天暗地之際,我的指導教授轉寄了一篇文章「Thinking Beyond the Dissertation」給我,要我空閒時當小品念念;我心中不由暗自竊喜,想說我的教授對我還真不錯,還跟我閒情逸致地分享一些啟發性的小品文;而且文章的title叫「Thinking Beyond the Dissertation」,應該是看我平時壓力不小,藉此文章來讓我跳脫一下到底博士論文要作啥的苦思。

結果我太過「浪漫化」我的指導教授了,因為文章的內容根本就不是那麼閒情逸致的小品,而是下馬威似的要博士生開始汲汲營營地經營自己的學術生涯;大意大概是說,不要以為進了名校當博士生就只要念書寫論文,然後就能順利找到教職;相反的,在當博士生的那一刻起,就必須開始思考如何建立關係、出版期刊文章、增加教書經驗、甚至開始練習應徵教職時的面談等等;看完後,頃刻間有股想休學回家算了的衝動!唉~其實指導教授的提醒也不無道理,特此把此篇文章分享給正在念博士或者想要念博士的你/妳!

至於我咧~先平安度過這可怕的期末週比較實際啦!


http://chronicle.com/jobs/2005/12/2005121201c.htm

Monday, December 12, 2005
Thinking Beyond the Dissertation
By DAVID D. PERLMUTTER and LANCE PORTER

Personal experiences on the job market

You have been accepted to a top doctoral program at a prestigious research university. You have made the decision to pursue the intellectual freedom and autonomy that accompany the academic life like practically no other profession. All you have to do is finish a dissertation, take some exams, and you can pick and choose the academic job you want, right?

Not so fast. You would think that graduate students would know it’s a little more complicated than that, after all the ink that has been spilled here about the challenges of an academic career. But many of them don’t.

What seems to elude some Ph.D. wannabees is the realization that doctoral education is not an end in itself but a way station. Too many students, alas, become so focused on the classroom, exam, and dissertation burdens of the moment that they graduate without really being prepared in terms of networking, intellectual development, and publication-ready texts.

We believe that careerism is no sin. Getting the most out of your studies and your dissertation is crucial to getting you on the tenure track and setting you up for the multiyear ascent from assistant to tenured professor. Other people — fellow students, faculty members, family — may help you (or hurt you), but in the end you alone are responsible for laying the foundations of your future.

In our experience, as many as half of you will drop out of the process, maybe more in some fields. Certainly, “chance and circumstance" will affect your future, but over the years certain strategies have proved reliable indicators of success in a doctoral program and beyond.

Start the Dissertation

Your initial priority as a doctoral student is to choose a direction for your dissertation. It is not something just to “finish." It ought to be your single most important source of research publications for your years as an assistant professor. A senior scholar once remarked that an ideal dissertation in the humanities and social sciences should contain the basis for six journal articles or one book or both.

To produce that volume of work, you should select a dissertation topic that is important, neither too vast or too thin, and can be completed in a few years. Specifically, does it contain discrete units of research that can be fleshed out as future articles or book chapters? Do not pick a “just something to get this over with" topic; you will be married to this enterprise for almost a decade (doing it as student, then publishing it as an assistant professor). Will your subject matter reward the sustained engagement?

Once you focus on a dissertation topic, try to orient all your classroom research papers toward it. Ideally, each new course in your program should yield the first draft of a dissertation chapter. Building an accretive set of knowledge toward a master document: That is called scholarship.

Think Publications Now

To become a scholar, you must become both a specialist and a generalist. Focus on one research topic so that you can legitimately say you are an “expert" on it. But also be able to claim credibly that your topic falls into a wider area of teaching and research that accords with the job categories in your discipline. An example from our field, mass communication: “My area is political communication; my special focus is on political advertising." It follows that you should not graduate with a CV or a bio-narrative that appears too narrow (six conference papers on “agenda setting in Bulgarian elections") or overly diffuse (“I study all forms of floral and faunal communication").

Think about avenues for your development as a scholar. While attending conferences is important, the single greatest imprimatur of credibility as a future scholar for hiring committees is publication in a top journal. Co-authorship is acceptable, although the suspicion will always be that the elder (in age and rank) author was also the senior “brain" behind it.

Build Relationships

Attend national conferences that attract scholars in your area of specialization and generalization. Meet with those people, even if only briefly; ask for their counsel on matters of research as well as your projected career. Those men and women may very well be on the hiring committees for your future job applications or be the “blind" referees of your future submissions to journals. Lay the seeds of your name recognition as well as your intellectual capital.

Take a similar track within your program. Work with scholars who have a national reputation and who seem to have many contacts throughout your field. The single best recommendation for a job applicant is not a laudatory letter from someone who barely knows you — those are so common and so tendentious as to be largely ignored — but a personal phone call from one of your intimate professors to a friend on the faculty of the department to which you are applying.

Make Yourself Marketable

Familiarize yourself with the employment marketplace. Even if graduation is years away, scan the job listings. (Do not, however, apply for jobs until you have at least finished your general exams.) Look for positions that attract you. What do they want? How will you grow to hold such qualifications?

Since one of the key qualifications will be teaching, you will need to develop classroom experience in your area of expertise. Show that you are able to teach a class in what you want to teach as an assistant professor. Prospective employers may be impressed by your publications, your erudition, your collegiality, but a basic question they have is: “What course of ours can you teach?"

Be honest with yourself and others about the parameters of your interests and abilities. Do not attempt to pass yourself off as a viable candidate for a position that involves research and teaching in areas of your ignorance or antipathy, simply for the sake for employment. Hiring committees can usually detect illusionists. Alternately, if your ruse (or self-deception) succeeds, the result will be a forced marriage of misery for years to come.

Plan Several Jobs in Advance

It is unlikely that your first job will be at the exact institution in the region of your dreams. Better to go after a college that could be your steppingstone (and who knows, you may grow to like it there). Institutions do not hire their own Ph.D.’s, but they do hire ones produced by their peers.

You need to decide which track you want to be on. A “teaching" college will not be a good gateway to a top research university; you will be too loaded down with class work, and the university will assume you are not on the “scholar" track. Better to get a first job at a university located somewhere you dislike, and then use that position to build up your CV.

Become an Expert Interviewee

An old piece of wisdom from politics is true in academic hiring as well: The most important message in any political campaign is the candidate. Faculty members will respect your CV, but they will hire you.

The interview — at a conference or on campus — is the crucial determinant of whether you get an offer or a rejection letter. Accordingly, it is best to learn as much about interviewing as possible. Volunteer to be the student representative on your department’s hiring committee; observe incoming candidates; ask others about their experiences; accumulate lists of obvious questions; rehearse in front of your faculty advisers.

Remember, interviews are not broadcast communication where one size fits all. Study the department and its faculty closely. Show them you know who they are and explain how you will fit in.

If you take away only one lesson let it be this: Being a doctoral student, and then a job candidate, is not a hiatus before the proper academic employment begins. The career track starts immediately.

David D. Perlmutter is an associate professor of mass communication at Louisiana State University and a senior fellow at its Reilly Center for Media & Public Affairs. Lance Porter is an assistant professor of mass communication and holds a joint appointment with the Laboratory for Creative Arts and Technology.

廣告
5 則迴響 leave one →
  1. Kai permalink
    12/19/2005 4:09 下午

    那我的回應是, Thinking Beyond the Tenure 啦。如果讀博只是為了進一流的研究大學做一輩子的象牙塔學者,不讀也罷。

  2. 12/25/2005 4:39 下午

    beyond the dissertation

    如同上一篇文章所說的,有不少社會科學的學者批評,社會科學已經漸漸失去原本的關懷。而其中一個關鍵的原因,應該是現行的學術環境。

  3. 痞子揚還在迷戀西南部一望無際的遼闊大地 permalink
    01/10/2006 7:27 上午

    Kai,

    好久不見了,在中國還好玩嗎? 下學期有沒有要來SF阿?

  4. huiyu permalink
    03/26/2007 10:09 下午

    循著孤狗大神五指山中的傅柯遺跡來到了貴站
    這幾天
    讀著這些關於學術或非關學術的文章
    大概是這三個月以來覺得最棒的消遣了
    謝謝站主們簡樸卻有趣生動的文字

    跳躍式的亂點
    現下看到這篇文章還是真是讓我冷汗直流

    身旁的學長姐
    大部分是1)在台任教數年, 出來求取功名, 好回台升等成教授
    要不久是2)傑出的專職學生, 一路攻上學制頂端, 企圖抱著博士學位光環進軍學術/研究界
    而這兩批人沒有一個看我這平生無大志的博士生不念上幾句的
    這些愛心的嘮叨不外乎也是文章中說的道理

    看來"讀博士只是學術生涯的開始"確實頗有其道理
    散漫的博生如我我也該靜下來想想這些問題

    只是
    冒冷汗之際也覺得無力
    不想循著學術的常規路子走
    自身的探險又還陷在胡同裡打轉
    另一種選擇沒有必然是輕鬆快意的
    想到這裡就忍不住嘆口氣

  5. 正為fieldwork funding煩惱的肉圓邑 permalink
    03/28/2007 7:52 上午

    哈囉!Huiyu,

    多虧了痞子揚的傅柯大作
    才能有像你這樣的新客人不經意地到雞鴨狗狒來坐坐
    踏上了學術路 尤其是沒啥所謂外頭「業界」可待的社會科學
    套句咱老師的話:Passion is Everything…
    一起加油囉!

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: